While EMF shielding might seem like a solution to reduce exposure to harmful electromagnetic fields, research indicates it can be counterproductive. Blocking natural frequencies like Schumann resonances, which regulate our circadian rhythms, can negatively impact health. A more effective approach involves minimizing exposure to controllable EMF sources, like phones and Wi-Fi, and utilizing devices that generate beneficial scalar fields to counteract the unavoidable EMF exposure of modern life.

When it comes to EMF protection, the idea of blocking, or shielding, EMFs is an obvious first thought.  It seems like a simple and straightforward answer, and satisfies our mental need to put a barrier between ourselves and the energy we want to get away from.  In the EMF protection industry, the terms Faraday cages and shields, EMF and RF shields, and protective fabrics and materials have become well known.  How effective are these products for actually protecting our health from the effects of manmade EMF sources?

EMF is dangerous, that is certain. If you still have any doubts about that, please read our other blog posts, like this one or this one. What do we do about it though? Shouldn’t we block EMF? We get this question from time to time, and we think it is time to publicly address it. There are many people in the EMF protection community who say that the only way to protect ourselves from EMF is by blocking it. There are multitudes of products on the market designed to do just that. You can drop tens of thousands of dollars...